NetRights welcomes new protection for social media users
This week the Government published its long-awaited White Paper on “Online Harms” which contains proposals intended to reduce harmful content on the internet.
The key proposals include the establishing of a new duty of care to legally oblige tech firms to take steps to protect their users. Compliance with this duty will be overseen by a new independent regulator and will be set out in new codes of practice. Tech companies that do not fulfil their duty of care could be fined, their senior managers held criminally liable or their website blocked entirely.
These measures are intended to tackle online material related to self-harm and suicide as well as terrorism, child abuse, revenge pornography, harassment and hate crimes. It also covers harmful behaviour such as cyber-bullying, trolling and the spread of fake news and disinformation.
The new regulatory framework will apply to social media platforms, messaging services, search engines, public discussion forums and file hosting sites.
Launching the White Paper on Online Harms, the Home Secretary warned of tech companies “For too long they have failed to go far enough and fast enough to help keep our children safe. They have failed to do the right thing – for their users, for our families, and for the whole of society … I’m giving tech companies a message they cannot ignore… It’s time for you to protect the users and give them the protection they deserve, and I will accept nothing else”.
The Government are consulting on various aspects of their plans for regulation including the options for appointing an independent regulatory body and its enforcement powers. The public consultation will be open from 8 April to 1 July 2019.
The White Paper has been published following growing concerns over the damaging content that is available online.
Ofcom, the communications sector regulator, found last autumn that 45% of internet users suffer harm from content that they view online. From trolling and bullying, theft of data or personal information, unwelcome attention via social media to hate speech, harassment or illegal sexual content, the dangers of the internet can be far-reaching.
Of particular concern is the impact of social media use on young people, including their ability to access with apparent ease images that appear to promote and glorify suicide and self-harm. Following the tragic death of a British teenager, and the revelation from other parents that social media played a role in their children’s suicides, there has been increasing momentum amongst the public and politicians to hold social media companies to account for the harmful content that they host.
The current position
Currently most online and social media sites are unregulated and are subject only to general legal requirements. This means that social media networks, video sharing platforms, search engines, online messaging services and nearly all other online services do not have to adhere to standards to protect users. In contrast Ofcom regulates television programmes and online video-on-demand services with a standards-based approach, as set out in the Ofcom Broadcasting Code. These standards include the protection of people under 18, protection from harmful or offensive material and material likely to incite crime and disorder as well as privacy rights.
NetRights welcomes the Government’s proposals to improve online safety.
Concerns have been expressed by some critics that the breadth of these new proposals threaten freedom of speech, limiting the online content that can be accessed by the public. However, we consider that the codes of practice can be carefully drafted to balance the rights of freedom of expression with the rights of individuals. As with the Ofcom Broadcasting Code, standards on harm and offence can be required to be set in a way which best guarantees freedom of expression.
Commenting on the White Paper, Head of NetRights, Laura Baglow said: “The current legal framework is fragmented and does not sufficiently address harmful online content, and in particular its ill effects on children and vulnerable groups. There is a gap to be filled by standards based independent regulation of social media sites. Independent regulation, with carefully drafted codes of practice, is needed to address the many dangers of the internet and social media. If the many benefits of social media and the internet are to be fully maximised in our society then it is essential to ensure that there is no space online for harm and abuse.”
The White Paper on Online Harms can be read in full here
Laura Baglow is head of NetRights, the Social Media, Internet and Media law department of Parnalls Solicitors. For legal advice and assistance with social media or internet postings please contact firstname.lastname@example.org or telephone 01566 772375. Find out more about NetRights here
Privacy rights and aerial images
Trustees’ duty to give information to beneficiaries
Five problems with a leasehold property
Taking your first commercial lease
Is your organisation protected from employee social media legal risk?
Have you been targeted by negative social media posts?
Farmers be alert when being inspected
Help for House Sellers?
Don’t let your digital assets end up in a digital grave
Valuing an estate for probate
Development proposals and your local authority search
What can you do if your child is injured in a serious accident
NetRights welcomes new protection for social media users
SHOULD I GET A LAWYER FOR A SPEEDING OFFENCE?
Supreme Court recognises that social media is a “casual medium” in libel battle
Choosing the best conveyancer who is right for you
Making a will after a second or subsequent marriage
Option or promotion agreement – which is best for landowners?
Anonymous pub and restaurant online reviews leave a bad taste
Have you had an accident involving a horse?
Help to Buy – beware of some cracks in the structure
Understanding Lasting Powers of Attorney
Changes to Energy Performance Certificate for Landlords
Had a cycling accident? Your route to obtaining compensation
New year, new home: tips to sell your home in the New Year
Tax Planning for your inheritance
Hearing loss: when your employer may be liable
Buying a home for your retirement, five things you need to consider
Farmers plan to diversify after Brexit
Ministers press ahead with probate fee shake-up - reports BBC News
Botched dental treatment? You may be entitled to compensation
Why a Health and Welfare Power of Attorney is a good idea
Will the new charge on building developments in Cornwall affect you?
Energy Performance Certificates – Do They Matter?
HMRC Challenging Stamp Duty Land Tax Payments
Ben Mitchell qualifies as a solicitor
The potential implications of Brexit on employment law
Appointing a guardian for your children
Houses in multiple occupation – new rules from October 2018
New Agriculture Bill published
Will Brexit affect my pension?
Dreaming of a holiday home? Sort out the legals before putting your feet up
Lasting Power of Attorney by Deborah Adams
Settled status after Brexit by Alexis Hager
How to choose an executor to administer your estate when you die
How overage agreements can boost profits from your land
Top tips for first-time buyers
How Could Brexit Affect My Farm?
Wills & Succession in Spain by Deborah Adams
Brexit – an international and local view by Alexis Hager, Litigation
Capital gains tax - important facts for non-residents of the UK
Buying a home: the importance of making sure the seller is entitled to sell
Changing a will after someone has died: it is possible and it could save you money
Your responsibilities when you have people working in your home
Sad passing of Battle of Britain pilot who served with Parnall family member
Considerations when buying a heritage property
Disciplinary proceedings at work: guide for employers
Employers should have a disciplinary process in place, but just following this may not be enough to avoid falling foul of the law and exposing yourself to the risk of an employment tribunal claim.