Disciplinary proceedings at work: guide for employers
Employers should have a disciplinary process in place, but just following this may not be enough to avoid falling foul of the law and exposing yourself to the risk of an employment tribunal claim. Your procedures need to be fair and your decisions need to be justifiable. Katherine Flashman Kitson, Director at Parnalls Solicitors in Launceston offers employers six tips for the fair handling of disciplinary issues.
When to suspend an employee
If an allegation of misconduct arises, suspending the accused employee should not be the default response. Instead, you should consider:
• the seriousness of the alleged misconduct and whether the employee’s behaviour could justify summary dismissal;
• the risks of further problems if the employee is allowed to remain in the workplace; and
• the possibility of interference with the investigation if they are not excluded.
Setting the boundaries of HR’s involvement
If you have a human resources department, they can help the managers responsible for dealing with disciplinary issues by advising on the procedure that should be followed and to ensure consistency of approach by giving examples of disciplinary action taken in the past. However, care should be taken to ensure that human resources do not influence managers to reach particular findings or to impose particular sanctions.
The right to be accompanied
Workers have the right to bring a trade union official or a colleague as a companion to any disciplinary hearing or appeal. Failing to allow a worker to be accompanied could result in an employment tribunal ordering you to pay the worker two weeks’ capped pay. In the event of an unfair dismissal claim, any compensation award could be increased by up to 25 per cent.
Unless your disciplinary policy provides otherwise, employees cannot generally insist on bringing anyone else as a companion. However, if a disabled employee requests that someone else be allowed to accompany them, then you will need to think carefully about whether you should agree to this where it may be necessary to ensure compliance with your obligation to make reasonable adjustments. Only in very rare circumstances will you have to allow a worker to be legally represented.
Two potentially guilty employees
Dismissing more than one employee suspected of serious misconduct may be fair where you cannot reasonably pin the blame on just one person. However, before moving to dismiss anyone you will need to be confident that the investigation you carried out was reasonable and so too was the way you acted to get to the point of identifying a group of potential suspects.
Employees raising a grievance
Although the raising of a grievance by an accused employee is often seen as an attempt to delay or derail the disciplinary process, you need to consider carefully what is being said.
A grievance may be:
• unconnected to the disciplinary proceedings, for example where an employee is accused of misconduct and chooses to raise a grievance about a proposed change to their shift patterns; or
• about the disciplinary proceedings, for example where an employee alleges that they have been unfairly singled out for disciplinary action because their line manager wants to make an example of them.
An unconnected grievance can be dealt with separately under your grievance procedure without putting the disciplinary process on hold.
Most grievances about the disciplinary process itself can usually be incorporated into the disciplinary proceedings, typically as an issue to be explored in the investigation or as a point to be considered in mitigation.
Care needs to be taken to ensure that the process remains fair, for instance by ensuring that you do not ask an employee’s line manager to deal with a disciplinary matter concerning them where the employee alleges that their line manager is biased.
Occasionally it may be necessary to put the disciplinary process on hold and to look into the grievance first, for example where an employee alleges that disciplinary action is being taken in retaliation for them having ‘blown the whistle’ on illegal activity.
Relying on final written warnings
If you are disciplining an employee for persistent lateness and they already have a live final written warning on their file for shouting at a customer, you need to consider whether you can rely on the warning to dismiss them. The answer will usually be ‘yes’ provided the warning is not worded too narrowly.
You may find yourself faced with an employee on a final written warning who has managed to behave themselves until just after the warning expires. In this situation you cannot rely on the previous warning to justify dismissing the employee if their alleged misconduct on this occasion would not of itself justify dismissal. You should, however, be able to dismiss an employee with a recently expired warning if the circumstances justify it and your knowledge of the warning simply means that you decide to take a hard line.
Dealing fairly with disciplinary matters requires careful consideration. Seeking help from an experienced employment lawyer will ensure that matters are handled appropriately and that your chances of being taken to an employment tribunal are greatly reduced. Advice can be given on the policies and procedures you need to put in place and on how investigations and disciplinary meetings ought to be dealt with. Proposed sanctions can be reviewed and if necessary settlement agreements negotiated to ensure difficult employees do leave.
For a confidential discussion about disciplinary matters, or for any other employment law issue, please contact Katherine Flashman Kitson on 01566 772375 or email firstname.lastname@example.org
Anonymous pub and restaurant online reviews leave a bad taste
Have you had an accident involving a horse?
Help to Buy – beware of some cracks in the structure
Understanding Lasting Powers of Attorney
Changes to Energy Performance Certificate for Landlords
Had a cycling accident? Your route to obtaining compensation
New year, new home: tips to sell your home in the New Year
Tax Planning for your inheritance
Hearing loss: when your employer may be liable
Buying a home for your retirement, five things you need to consider
Farmers plan to diversify after Brexit
Ministers press ahead with probate fee shake-up - reports BBC News
Botched dental treatment? You may be entitled to compensation
Why a Health and Welfare Power of Attorney is a good idea
Will the new charge on building developments in Cornwall affect you?
Energy Performance Certificates – Do They Matter?
HMRC Challenging Stamp Duty Land Tax Payments
Ben Mitchell qualifies as a solicitor
The potential implications of Brexit on employment law
Appointing a guardian for your children
Houses in multiple occupation – new rules from October 2018
New Agriculture Bill published
Will Brexit affect my pension?
Dreaming of a holiday home? Sort out the legals before putting your feet up
Lasting Power of Attorney by Deborah Adams
Settled status after Brexit by Alexis Hager
How to choose an executor to administer your estate when you die
How overage agreements can boost profits from your land
Top tips for first-time buyers
How Could Brexit Affect My Farm?
Wills & Succession in Spain by Deborah Adams
Brexit – an international and local view by Alexis Hager, Litigation
Capital gains tax - important facts for non-residents of the UK
Buying a home: the importance of making sure the seller is entitled to sell
Changing a will after someone has died: it is possible and it could save you money
Your responsibilities when you have people working in your home
Sad passing of Battle of Britain pilot who served with Parnall family member
Considerations when buying a heritage property
Disciplinary proceedings at work: guide for employers
Employers should have a disciplinary process in place, but just following this may not be enough to avoid falling foul of the law and exposing yourself to the risk of an employment tribunal claim.